• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
USG Senate agrees on ethics code PDF  | Print |

For the first time in Princeton USG history, the Senate has established for itself a code of ethics to which each member plans to adhere in order to improve performance and efficiency. Members have committed themselves to the very highest standards of dedication, activism, and honesty for the betterment of USG as a whole. The Senate's strong value for integrity, honesty, and commitment to representing the student body materializes in a novel and comprehensive Ethics Document, signed by all members of the USG Senate. From stipulating rules for communication to attendance standards, the new administration hopes that this manifestation of what has long been implicit in USG standards will improve what the USG can do and will do for the student body for many years to come. Click "Read More" below to see the ethics code and the signed document.

 

USG Ethics Code

Standards for Senate meetings:

  • Maintain professionalism by avoiding personal attacks - critique without criticizing
  • Substantiate your own opinion, but be respectful of others' opinion
  • Communicate on a first name basis and as clearly as possible
  • Keep discussions open and inclusive, yet timely and relevant
  • Minimize distractions (i.e. no laptops, Blackberries, etc.)

Communication with the Prince:

  • Do not belittle others' opinions or criticize one other to the press
  • Solve issues internally - there is no reason to involve the Prince in our solutions
  • Do not comment anonymously on Prince articles
  • Disagreements are to be stated as opposition to a stance, not to the person who holds it

Executive Session:

  • Anything said during Executive Session is strictly off the record
  • All standards of conduct for Senate meetings apply for Executive Session
  • Should be called with discretion, and for issues internal to USG

Elections:

  • Elections should avoid personal attacks and be positive in nature
  • The President may not endorse candidates in any way
  • Members of the Senate may not make endorsements on behalf of any other individuals
  • No one should have access to election results before they are approved by the Registrar, with the exception of the Elections Manager and any IT member who is charged with the sites maintenance.

Violations of Code of Ethics:

  • A censure is a formal reprimand, issued in the form of a verbal speech by the highest ranking official not directly involved in front of the entire Senate.
  • Complaints should go to the highest-ranking officer who is not involved, and he or she has the ability to decide whether or not voting on censure is an appropriate action
  • Censure is less serious than removal from office, and must be approved by a 2/3 majority of the Senate
  • President will announce violations of the Ethics Code in Senate meetings or Executive Session
  • Censure will be voted on, if necessary, in Executive Session

 

Download the signed ethics code

 
Respond to this article

Search Senators

Search Committees

Search Groups

Search Classes

Air Your Grievance

Subscribe to News